Futures Trading Lab · Research & backtesting

Turn observations into testable claims.

This is where chart observations are supposed to stop being anecdotes. The research process defines the question, the dataset, the rules, the assumptions, the failure cases, and the evidence required before a trading idea earns more authority.

Research standard: a chart example is not a backtest, a backtest is not proof of future profitability, and a model output does not receive authority simply because it is quantitative.
1 · Question

Define the hypothesis

State exactly what behavior is being tested, how the setup/state is defined, and what evidence would count against the idea.

2 · Method

Define the sample

Instrument, contract handling, date range, session, timezone, data source, inclusion/exclusion rules, entries, stops, exits, fees, and slippage assumptions must be explicit.

3 · Evidence

Preserve the result

Record sample size, metrics, failure cases, limitations, parameter changes, and whether the result was tested out of sample or only discovered in sample.

Core research areas

What the lab is built to investigate.

Research themes include market-state classification, balance-to-expansion transitions, accepted breakouts, 5m/15m EMA authority, VWAP conflict, VALUE depth, REASSERT, micro-BOS continuation, corrective versus reversing pullbacks, protected-structure management, late-entry degradation, session behavior, and funded-account drawdown constraints.

Market state

Campaign, Trend, Flow, Balance

Measure what distinguishes the states, how transitions behave, where false expansion occurs, and whether the classification adds decision value beyond hindsight labeling.

Authority

EMA / VWAP control

Test directional authority, slope/separation quality, control-stack compression, acceptance, and the difference between a crossover and durable control.

Execution

VALUE, REASSERT & continuation

Study pullback depth, continuation timing, micro structure, chase distance, failure rates, and whether fresh execution permission improves expectancy.

Management

Hold versus failure

Compare corrective pullbacks, anchored protected structure, major-move holding, MFE/MAE behavior, and structural exits against premature discretionary exits.

Metrics

Context before headline numbers.

Depending on the study, the lab may use expectancy, win rate, payoff ratio, profit factor, maximum drawdown, MAE/MFE, time in trade, time-of-day distributions, slippage sensitivity, and regime stability. No metric is meaningful here without the sample definition and limitations attached to it.

Published studies will appear here.

The public research index will only list studies that are ready to show with enough methodology and limitations to be useful. Failed or inconclusive internal work remains part of the private evidence record even when it never becomes public content.

Research notes